MONTHLY REVIEW
Published by the American Electroplaters
Society
Publication and Editorial
Office, 3040 Diversy Ave., Chicago
VOL. XVI APRIL, 1929 No. 4
EDITORIAL
Just twenty years ago nine
or 10 congenial foreman platers, under the chairmanship of Charles H. Proctor,
had formed a modern little society for purposes
of improving the art of-electrodeposition of metals in all its branches
and
the dissemination
of the knowledge of its practice.
It was decided that all laws and
rules must be so formed that the society would promote no other object
than that of the education
of its members
in the principles
of electro-plating and finishing of metals and kindred materials.
It
may be said that they have built better than they ever dreamed; these thoughtful
men with all their hopes and lofty aspirations
could hardly
have foreseen the
tremendous growth of this industry; nor have anticipated the
rapid rise to leadership among the educational societies of the world
of the American
Electro-Plater’s
Society.
And now in the stalwart maturity
of its accomplished years, when it celebrates with pride its twentieth birthday,
no better suggestion
can be made for
its future course than that it should continue to maintain,
as
its chief aim,
an unfaltering
fidelity to those fundamental purposes which were adopted for
it by
its fathers twenty years ago. That way leads surely onward
and upward.
THE ELECTRO DEPOSITION OF TIN
Recent Improvements in Sodium Stannate Solutions
By Charles H. Proctor
It is not the intention of the author of this paper to
again go into the history of electro tin plating or-its deposition by simple
immersion in suitable baths
or by the contact method. These data were published in detail by the author
in a paper read at the Newark, N. J., meeting of the American Electro Platers’ Society
in June, 1926, and will also be found in The Metal Industry, December, 1926,
pages 502-503. Another very excellent paper covering- the same subject was
also printed in the November, 1926, issue of The Metal Industry, page 463,
entitled "Electro Deposition of Tin?’ (Practical methods of tin
plating), by Walter Fraine. These two papers cover in detail the sodium stannate
tin solution first introduced to the metal fabricating industry by the author.
In
the past few years the electro deposition of tin in the metal fabricating industries
has grown to be of great importance primarily because tin is nature’s
best gift to mankind to coat steel with for protection and conservation of
his food products, almost indefinitely, as pure as when they cane from nature’s
gardens.
The saving in cost to the consumer in food products so conserved runs
into hundreds of millions of dollars per year.
Electro tin deposits, however,
are not as yet applied to the thin sheets of steel which eventually become
the "tin plate of commerce." All
tin plate is produced by the application-of molten tin to the sheet steel by
immersing the cleansed and previously fluxed sheet steel in the molten tin
bath with subsequent quenching in the proper cooling medium which results in
the bright tin plate of commerce. Hundreds of thousands of tons of such product
is produced in America today.
In the non-ferrous metal industry, however, the
electro deposition of tin, especially in the production of tinned sheet copper
and brass, has not assumed
great tonnage production. The hot tin application is still used extensively
for the purpose, for the coating of sheet copper with tin for heavy coatings
especially adapted for the fabrication of copper steam kettles used in the
dairy, vegetable and fruit preserving and candy making industries, electro
deposited tin upon copper, and finally rolled under the usual metal rolling
process to produce hardness and render the crystalline structure of the deposited
tin, less crystalline and more compact due to a slight elongation of both the
tin and copper resulting from the metal rolling process is constantly on the
increase.
One of the largest copper and sheet brass and incidental products
industry in America, if not in-the world, is using the electro tin plated process
for
sheet copper as outlined.
The value of tin as we all know from the hundreds
of millions of tin cans used in the cooking and preservation of all kinds of
food products is because tin
is not acted upon by lactic acid or any of the fruit and vegetable acids that
nature has placed in our food products for the good of humanity.
In the electric
refrigeration industry electro tin plated deposits upon copper refrigerating
coils, etc., is being used very extensively. One of the largest
of such firms in the middle west operates a complete tin plating unit for this
purpose. It is completely automatic in every detail from the cleansing of the
copper coils, etc.; the coppering over of the soldered joints, etc., by copper
plating, the several water washings; the final tin plating, washing and drying
of the product, so that it eventually is placed by mechanical conveyors in
front of the inspector to be finally passed along for assembly and finished
product.
The tin plating bath alone has a volume capacity of 20,000 gallons.
In addition many mechanical plating barrels are operated in the same plant
for tin plating:
small metal parts used in the construction of the refrigerating units.
In your
great and wonderful magic city of Chicago electro tin plating has been done
for more than fifteen years. Quite recently a very progressive firm of
mechanical platers for the jobbing trade installed electro tin plating baths
from data submitted to them by the author, and their business is constantly
growing for electro tin plated products.
In the telephone industry, electro
tin plating will no doubt be used extensively for the protection of brass and
copper fabricated parts from atmospheric oxidation.
One of the largest of such firms has adopted the method after extensive research
by their engineering department.
In the manufacture of all types of meters, whether electrical, gas or water,
electro tin deposits have been found to be the best protecting factor against
oxidation for all the small gear parts, pinions, etc., used in the construction
of such meters. Especially so is this true for meters used in tropical countries
where high humidity atmospheric conditions exist.
Cadmium deposits were first
tried out but due to galvanic action between the brass metal and the cadmium
deposit, the cadmium disintegrated and returned
to a semi-oxide condition and became entirely non-adhesive, so its value for
protecting brass from atmospheric oxidation is practically valueless.
It is
possible to continue the elaboration of the value of electro tin deposits further,
but it is not necessary for the purpose the author has in mind, that
of giving data covering the improvements in the present tin electrolytes. There
is, however, one important factor that I should mention to you considering
the tremendous increase in cost of cadmium metal during the latter months of
1928 which will eventually destroy all interest in the metal from its economic
value as a maximum factor in the protection of ferrous metals, iron and steel,
from atmospheric corrosion and eventual destruction and be replaced with deposits
of zinc from improved methods of deposition and the introduction of the rust
proof black finishes.
The metal fabricating industry is anxious to learn the
true reason for such a tremendous increase in the cost of the metal. Is it
due to manipulation or
to the natural law of supply and demand? This is what the electro plating industry
has a natural right to know as well as the metal fabricating industries.
The
electro deposition of cadmium can be replaced as a protecting anti-corrosion
factor by deposits of zinc at one-twentieth the cost of cadmium, when the cost
of the metal at one dollar and twenty cents per pound is used as a basis as
against ten cents per pound for electrolytic zinc. Furthermore, we must also
consider that the density of cadmium is 75 per cent greater than zinc, when
we reduce density to cost figures, then we find a cubic square inch of cadmium
will weigh 75 per cent more than an equal cubic square inch of zinc. You can
see then that if you deposit one-ten-thousandth of an inch in thickness of
either cadmium or zinc upon a basic metal surface the cadmium will be 75 per
cent heavier than the zinc in weight. Therefore, in figuring costs of cadmium
plating as compared with zinc upon its true basis you will arrive at a cost
of twenty to one as compared with the same thickness of zinc deposit at a cost
of ten to fourteen cents for zinc anodes.
It is always well to remember that
you cannot deposit any metal at a lower cost than that of the price of the
anode irrespective of any contention or
controversy to the contrary.
When you have decided to replace cadmium with zinc
then install an improved electro tin plating solution, if you decide that you
want a finish equal in
whiteness to that of cadmium. Only a very minute deposit of electro tin will
be necessary upon the basic deposit of zinc then you will have produced a duo
deposit of zinc and tin that may give you even a greater protective value than
it is possible to obtain from either zinc or cadmium alone at one-tenth the
cost of cadmium. The tin will prevent the zinc from atmospheric oxidation,
therefore, a more perfect protection against atmospheric corrosion should result.
In
the R. & H. Chemical Company’s research division at Perth Amboy,
N. J., we are making comparative tests as to the economic and protecting value
of the duo deposits of zinc and tin as against zinc or cadmium as separate
protecting factors. Metallic tin costs only one-half the price of cadmium.
I
have elaborated in detail because I desired to bring the true story of electro
deposits of tin to you. In my December, 1926 paper covering the "Electro
Deposition of Tin" the following formula was given:
Anode to cathode ration, 1 to 1 to 2 to 1. Amperage,
10 to 15 per square foot of surface area. Electro motive force, 6 to 8 volts.
Temperature, 140 to 160 °F.
Speed of rotation of barrel, 10 per minute, plus or minus. The control of the
barrel or mechanical solutions is identical with still plating solutions.
It
has been found that the still solution formula gives excellent results also
in a barrel, so it can be left to the plater or chemist to decide just what
proportions for solution is best adapted for his purpose, from the minimum
to maximum formula outlined.
All commercial metals and alloys may be plated
with electro deposits of tin from these solutions. Cast iron, steel, copper,
bronze, brass, zinc, lead,
zinc die castings and cadmium. The necessary cleansing must be carried
out under commercial conditions best adapted for the respective metals to be
tin plated. As all platers as a rule thoroughly understand the preparation
of the
basic metal surfaces and their chemical cleansing it is not necessary to
go into the matter in detail at this time.
If better results are obtained
in electro tin plating from the data included in the paper and a greater
demand for electro tin plated products results,
I shall feel fully repaid for the time spent in writing up this paper.
PAPER ON “CHROMIUM EXPERIMENTS"
By Oliver J. Sizelove, Newark
Branch
MR. OLIVER J. SIZELOVE: In presenting this paper I would like
to just say a few things before proceeding, that chromium was suggested as
a study
by members
of the Newark Branch in the class that was taught last winter at the Vocational
School at Newark. The solution or formula taken was the Bureau of Standards’ formula
that was used in all our experiments and it was simply a repetition of the
work that has been done by the Bureau of Standards by the plater or common
plater. I will say, of today. Those experiments were practically duplicated,
showing you that it doesn’t require a man with a great knowledge of chemistry
to produce those same results.
"The students, foreman electro-platers, of the
Electro-plating class at Sussex Avenue vocational School, Newark, New Jersey,
requested that a study be
made
of chromium plating solutions. The class was divided into small groups, each
group under the leadership of a plater, who possessed a fair knowledge of the
chemical control of plating solutions in general. The whole class was under
the direction of the instructor.
"The plan of study included the making of a
chromium solution according to a workable published formula, and the effect
of different variables on the
operation
of the solution and the character of the work produced. The Haring formula,
as published in the U. S. Bureau of Standards Technologic paper No. 346, was
used. The variables included temperature, area of anode and cathode surface
and their relation to each other, metal for anodes, metal for cathodes, current
density, concentration of chromic acid and of sulphuric acid and cathode efficiency.
The ‘tanks’ used were made of steel and had a capacity of two gallons.
With few exceptions made for experimental data, the cathodes were rolled brass
which had been colored buffed. Anodes of steel, of stainless steel, and of
lead, were used. In ‘all rims the area of the anode was one-half of that
of the cathode, except in one run where the effect of the area of the electrodes
was studied. Two anodes and one cathode were used. The cathode area was sixteen
sq. in., 1/9 sq. ft. or 1 dem.2, the distance between electrodes four inches.
"Effect of Temperature.—Having an anode area of one-half the cathode
area and keeping a constant current density, 1.25 amperes per sq. inch, the
effect of
varying temperatures is quite noticeable. At 90° F. the polish brass
cathode assumes a dull milky color with cloudy edges. At 113° F. the
center of the cathode is clear and bright, but the edges are still cloudy.
At 131° F. the entire surface is clear and bright. It is evident that
at this temperature and current density the best results are obtained on polished
brass cathodes in the Haring solution containing the recommended amount of
chromic acid and sulphuric acid.
"Current Density.—Using the same
solution at the temperature at which the best results were obtained an experiment
was made to ascertain the effect
of different
current densities. At amperes per square inch the deposit is clear and bright.
At 1.9 amperes per sq. inch the edges of the cathodes become dull. At 3.5 amperes
per square inch the whole surface of the cathode has a dense matted appearance,
the edges showing a distinct burnt appearance. It is quite evident from these
experiments that the current density of 1.25 amperes per sq. inch is probably
the proper one to use at this temperature.
"Another set of cathodes were run
at a temperature of 113° F. for comparison.
At .5 amperes per sq. inch the deposit is clear and bright. This is what would
be expected as both temperature and current density have been decreased. At
1.25 amperes per sq. inch the edges of the cathode become quite dark. The same
frosted appearance of the cathode is had, as in the previous test, where a
high current density is used. For example, 2.5 amperes per sq. inch.
"Anode
Area.—There has been considerable discussion as to the relation
of the anode area to that of the cathode area. When the anode area is one-half
that
of the cathode area in the recommended Haring bath at 1.25 amperes per sq.
inch and 113° F. the surface of the cathode is clear and bright. If the
anode area is increased so as to equal that of the cathode, the edges and especially
the bottom have a distinct burnt appearance. If the anode area is increased
fifty per cent over the cathode area the burnt edges present a different appearance.
It seemingly gives a hard brittle deposit. This is what would be expected in
an ordinary plating solution except that in the latter case there may be granulations.
"When
the anode area is equal to the cathode area there seems to be a difference
in the current distribution which effects all sides of the cathode,
while with
the large anode area the effect seems to be at the bottom of the cathode. This
is what would be expected when the anode area is larger than the cathode area.
It is of interest to note that at the same current density the voltage is lower
when the cathode area exceeds the anode area.
"Anode Material.—When different anode material is
used in a solution at a cathode current density of 1.25 amperes per sq. inch
a marked difference
is seen in
the deposit on the cathode. This is quite unexpected and of interest. It
should also be noted that to obtain the current density given that different
voltages
were- necessary.
"With lead as the anode 5 1/4 volts were used and the
cathode while bright in the center had milky edges. When steel anodes were
used at a pressure of
4 1/2 volts, the same current density was obtained as above and the cathode was
clear and bright. Stainless steel contains chromium and as would be expected
it offered more resistance to the current and therefore 4 3/4 volts were
necessary
to obtain the same current density. The cathode had patches that are dull
while main body has a bright lustre but not as brilliant as when steel or lead
was
used.
"Cathode Material.—It is quite important that the factors governing
the conditions for good deposits be carefully controlled when cathodes of different
metals are used. In the experiments made the anode was in all cases-half of
that of the cathode. The temperature was constant, 113° F. If brass is
used as the cathode, it is evident that the current density range for a bright ‘deposit
is quite wide as very similar deposits were obtained at ,65 and 1.25 amperes
per sq. inch. In both cases, the pressure was 4 volts. In using steel as
the cathode the same general conditions are noted except that at the higher
current
density the deposit is more clear and has a more dense appearance.
"When lead is used as the cathode the effect of current
density is readily seen. While this may be true in the same way with other
metals, it is not as
effective
as with lead. At a current density of 1.25 amperes per sq. inch the lead
cathode has a complete covering of chromium and at .65 amperes per sq. inch the
lead
is only stained. This indicates that at low current densities there is no
reduction of chromium at the cathode made of lead.
"Method of Introducing Cathode in Solution.—There is a difference
of opinion as to whether the work should be in circuit before being introduced
into the
solution or if the current should be turned on after the work is in the solution.
In the samples shown the word ‘alive’ indicates that the current
was on when the cathode was plated, and the word ‘dead’ indicates
that the current was off when the cathode was put into the solution.
"On steel there is seemingly very little difference, probably some evidence
of a slight stain. With brass as the cathode the deposit is more brilliant
when plated ‘alive.’ When ‘dead’ the deposit is
milky.
"It has been stated that chromium can be deposited upon a chromium plated
article if the cathode is dead. The experiment made indicates that either ‘dead’ or ‘alive’ the
deposit is not to be compared with that obtained directly upon a brass
or steel surface. It is evident, however, that there is less tendency for the
deposit
to peel or raise when the cathode is ‘dead.’
"Chromic Acid.—While a standard solution made of
thirty three ounces of chromic acid, .33 ounces sulphuric acid to one gallon
of water is generally
recommended,
in the series of experiments conducted, the effect of a lower and also
of a higher concentration was made. This had an effect upon the efficiency and
upon
the character of the deposit which was expected.
"In plating in general it has always been considered that
a fairly high metal concentration will give the best cathode efficiency.
Recent experiments
seem
to indicate that this is not entirely correct.
"In the chromium solution that bad practically one-half the concentration
of the solution generally used a cathode efficiency of 18.9 per cent was obtained,
while a solution having twice the concentration had an efficiency of
only
8.3 per cent. This is in direct contrast with the efficiency of the
standard solution which was 16.3 per cent. The solution was run at 1.25 amperes
per square inch and at 113° F. The anodes were of lead and the cathodes
brass. The anode area was one-half of the cathode area. This may be seemingly
contradictory, but it should be borne in mind that the deposit was upon a flat
surface. It
does not follow that the dilute solution is the ideal one as other
factors,
such as throwing power, may be affected to such an extent that it would
be impracticable to use commercially. It does, however, make an interesting
experiment and produces results that should be of value for certain classes
of work.
"Sulphates. The sulphate content of a chromium solution
exerts a greater influence upon the deposit than is generally supposed. In
all probability
the failure
of a great number of solutions has been due to an incorrect sulphate
content. If it is too low or too high, poor results are obtained. It affects
distribution
of the current, character of the deposit and throwing power.
"From a series of experiments made, there seems to be
little difference as to what kind of a sulphate salt used. The greatest effect
was noted
in the amount
used.
"In a solution containing no sulphates the efficiency
is zero. Nothing but a discoloration of the cathode is obtained. At the concentration
recommended by Haring, a higher cathode efficiency is obtained than with twice
the amount
of sulphates added. The throwing power and adherence is best in low
sulphuric acid concentration.
"Experiments were made with solutions containing thirty-three
ounces chromic acid, .24 ounces, .48 ounces, .72 ounces, and .96 ounces of
sulphuric
acid per gallon. The effect of each concentration of the sulphates is noticeable.
It would be difficult to put this entirely in writing and it is suggested
that
a study be made of the samples.
"In this experiment some of the cathodes were bent at
right angles and used to ascertain the throwing power. It is of interest
to note that
the solution containing a low sulphate content (.24 ounces) has the best throwing
power.
"In solutions having 66 ounces chromic acid and 1.35 ounces
sulphuric acid per gallon, the throwing power is poorest and contrary to
expectations
the character
of the deposit on a flat surface from the same solution is excellent.
"In general it has been found that the proportion of 100 parts by weight
of chromic acid to one part by weight of sulphuric acid gives the most consistent
results, thus confirming Haring’s conclusions.
"Experiments made with this solution show the efficiency
to be from 4.1 per cent to 5.5 per cent. If these efficiencies are compared
with those
of the dilute solution previously mentioned in this paper it will be noted that
there
is quite a difference. The average efficiency of the more concentrated
solutions is 4.7 per cent, while that of the low concentrated solutions is 14.8
per cent.
"To test the throwing power of the Haring solution, experiments
were made with cathodes bent at right angles using a total current upon a
surface
of eight sq. inches at ten, six and four amperes. The best throwing power was
had at
the highest current density.
"The author wishes to thank the students of his class for their careful
work and the assembling of the data which is incorporated in this paper, also
Dr.
Graham for his valuable suggestions." (Applause.)
Mr. Musick
took the Chair during the reading of the above paper.
CHAIRMAN MUSICK:
Are there any questions to be asked of Mr. Sizelove?
QUESTION: In working on
the anode surface was any attempt made to make the relative position of the
anode to cathode the same
as where
the
larger anode
surface was used?
MR. SIZELOVE: Yes, the current density was maintained
the same.
QUESTION: But the physical relation between anode and cathode—(interrupted).
MR. SIZELOVE: No, only with the exception that when we studied
sulphate factor in those anodes-that were bent at right angles,
some of them
in that case,
the lower part of the cathode, would have been nearer to the anode
than the top of it.
QUESTION: How long was it run?
MR. SIZELOVE: Five minutes.
QUESTION: Was an investigation made as to the formation
of chromates?
MR. SIZELOVE: There were samples taken from the solution. Complete
analysis has not been made of that, when it is it will be published.
There is
other work to be done upon it, and as the work is completed it
will be published.
QUESTION: I understood you to say you used a
steel anode. When you used steel, did you use half of the cathode, the same
as the lead? (Assent.) What were the results of that’?
MR.
SIZELOVE: When steel anodes were used the efficiency seemed to
be higher but I don’t think it’ is advisable to use
the steel anode. That is the reason I realize the experiments when
checked up didn’t give the
results we could recommend in using the steel anode. Products form
on the steel anode which do not on the other anode.
MR. WOOD: I
would like to me a few remarks on the lead anode question as applied
to chromic acid plating bath. Probably the only reason
we use lead
anodes for
anode material or use lead for anode material is because we keep
the solution oxidized, thereby minimizing the injurious effect
of trivalent
chromium.
If the lead anode is placed in the solution and worked very quickly
there forms
a layer of lead peroxide. The lead peroxide which has the immediate
effect of keeping the solution oxidized, not the lead itself, lead
peroxide,
if you once form a coating of lead peroxide you find even in standing
over
a considerable
period of time there is practically no tendency for the formation
of lead chromate, and you don’t have to clean your anode
if you have lead peroxide on it. Lead chromate is injurious, and
if it forms on the anode, remove it, by all
means clean them. If you take an anode out, clean it, use it for
an hour, you will again have a coating of lead peroxide on the
surface, and also there does
not seem to be a very great tendency for that lead peroxide coating
to increase in thickness. Therefore, increase resistance receptivity,
and so cause trouble
on that score. I think at times it might be to your advantage to
remove anodes from the tank and keep them clean, but my experience
has been a very infrequent
cleaning is all that is necessary.
QUESTION: I want to ask how to
prevent lead chromate from forming on the lead anode.
MEMBER: In
the operation of the bath, oxygen is liberated at the anode in some way, the
sane as in a storage battery, and the tendency
under
electrolysis is for the lead peroxide to form - and not for lead
chromate to form.
If lead stands exposed, the fresh surface of lead in the chromic
acid plating bath lead chromate forms rapidly and in considerable
thickness.
It is entirely
due to the electrolysis of the solution.
MEMBER: Between loads you
have got to let your anodes stand in chromic acid bath, electro chromate forms.
MEMBER:
It has not been my experience that it forms in any considerable amount. This
lead peroxide usually forms a fairly adherent coating
on the lead, and
therefore protects any lead from the action of the chromic acid
bath. The chromic acid bath is in itself an oxidizing solution
and its
tendency seems
to be to
maintain the coating of lead peroxide once it is completely formed
in preference to taking the lead underneath and forming lead chromate.
MEMBER:
That is the opposite experience.
MR. SEEBURGER: There is a difference in quality
of lead, by using lead with a six per cent antimony you do not get lead chromate
formed like
you do with
pure lead.
MEMBER: I surely neglected to mention that. I stand corrected.
It is very important in the use of an alloy lead anode.
MR. ALLEN:
The first two or three weeks I thought we had to clean those anodes. I don’t
know anything about chemistry or anything like that but I want to tell you
that for eight months or better they have never been out of the
tank and we are getting good results, so you can put that down
from practical experience.
MR. Ter DOEST: I would like to say that when I take
my anodes out I am in trouble. As long as I leave them in there I do nice work
but
my anodes
are
so constructed
that I have to change the anodes for different work I do, and when
I take them out I get into trouble. When I leave them, I don’t.
I have it thick in one hour. It is just as smooth as it can possibly
be.
DR. GRAHAM: I would like to refer to the last gentleman’s
remarks. I believe it can be possible that he can have his positions
so fixed that he
gets satisfactory results after leaving his anodes in the tank.
We can place with anodes which are badly polarized by formation
of a film of lead chromate,
but the gentleman that formerly spoke about that said he used about
seven and a half volts. I believe if you refer to that, if your
have pure leads, clean
lead, as your anode, you can accomplish your deposition at a lower
voltage than that. If you take your anode out it is likely that
the condition under
which your deposit to get your satisfactory result will be different
and will take some experimenting to determine just exactly what
positions of voltages
will give you a correct result, but I still believe that the clean
anode will give you a better result.
Mr. Wood referred to the effect
of lead peroxide on that anode. I believe that the tendency for the lead chromate
to form when
the
anode is allowed
to remain
in the solution without current would be reduced. I don’t
believe it would be eliminated. On the other hand, in putting that
peroxide coating on
the anode, if the practice of merely hitting your lead anode in
the solution and turning current on is going to be used, there
is a question of how effective
a film of lead peroxide you are going to form.. You know in making
storage batteries the method of producing that peroxide film is
the most important
thing, and they go to a great deal of care and trouble to get a
thick, impervious peroxide coating. I believe that just hiding
your anode in the chromium solution
that would be the case in ordinary operation, the peroxide which
forms there would not be a very thick impervious coating, and it
is still possible that
the lead chromate would have an effect.
Then going back to another point: it has been proven that pure
lead will regenerate your chromate salt and acid more effectively.
Now,
there is
a question as to
whether you think it pays you to use anodes which are polarized
with chromate, use a high voltage to get your results, and build
up chromium
salt in your
solution, or to remove your anodes daily, keep them fresh and clean,
by so doing, plating at lower voltage and maintain your chromic
content of
your
solution more nearly constant. It is up to you to determine which
pays you, but there
are both sides of the picture.
MR. Ter DOEST: In view of Mr. Graham’s
saying about the voltage, the voltage I used, the maximum, three
and a half; on different work, it is from
three to three and a half according to the job I do, but I have
had more trouble with anode corrosion than any one thing I have
had to do with and I found out
when I left them alone I was all right. I had them in hydrofluoric
acid and potash and I don’t know what, all night too, and
couldn’t get it
off, and that is in the solution and kept there.
MR. HOGABOOM: When
one speaks about the voltage that is used in chromium solution
it is probably essential that you should designate
the relation
between your
anode and your cathode area.
MR. Ter DOEST: Three anodes and one
cathode.
MR. HOGABOOM: That is why you have a low voltage. It is very easy.
Suppose you have one square foot of anodes and one square foot
of cathodes and
you are running, we will just take a problematical solution, 100
amperes to the
square foot. At that relation you are using, we will say, six volts.
You have then accumulated current density of 100 amperes. You have
an anode
current density of 100 amperes. If we change this and make it one-half
a square foot
anode, one square foot of cathode, and we want to get 100 ampere
cathode current
density, then we must have 200 amperes anode current density and
we cannot get that at six volts. It is quite probable that we may
have
to go to
seven and a half volts. On the other hand if we have one square
foot of anode
and half a square foot of cathode and we want 100 amperes per square
foot on
the cathode we can get that at fifty amperes anode current density
and instead of six volts we may get that at three and a half volts,
so when
I am talking
chromium solution and talking on what voltage you are using you
must take into
consideration the relation of your anode to your cathode area.
(Applause.)
MR. GRUND: I might say I take and plate a twelve foot
square area with an anode surface of eight and a half sq. feet. The anode we
use is
of an air
hoist type.
The anode is taken out of the tank and hoisted by air at the end
of the day’s
run. We just merely rinse that off with a hose and brush and let
it hang there over night, and that is all that is done, and we
have had no trouble. The thickness
of the anode is about three-sixteenths of an inch in thickness.
MR.
HOGABOOM: I would like to ask one question, please, of Mr. Wood.
In the case of where the anode may have a peroxide, is there
not
a tendency for
lead chromate to form that is not adherent and falls to the bottom
of the
tank.
MR. WOOD: I don’t believe we could use lead anodes
in an acid chromium solution without getting some lead chromate
formed, but it is never formed
in our experience in very large amounts. I don’t know why
it is so we plate successfully without cleaning anode and with
low voltages, keeping in
mind the fact that we use relatively large anode-cathode area ratios
but we do not have much trouble with formation of lead chromate
on six per cent antimony
lead anode.
MR. Ter DOEST: This anode question—I think the
higher current concentration at the anode, the less trouble you
will have. They will say, why don’t
you make your anode surface smaller. I can’t. I am within
a quarter of an inch of my anode now. I am putting each one of
these in a hole to take the
concentricity. We sent these out to have done by all kinds of people,
plated on two sides, but not on the other two. With the federal
indicator it jumps
like that, and to get these round we have a hole in the anode we
drop each one in, that is three-quarters of an inch. The article
is about a quarter of
an inch and we are a quarter of an inch round and we cannot make
the anode surface smaller, but it is my experience before that’ I
think the higher current density at the anode the less trouble
you have with the anode.
PAPER ON CHROMIUM PLATING DIE CAST METAL
By Mr. B. F. Lewis, of Detroit
PRESIDENT FEELEY: I have asked Mr. Hogaboom
if he will read.this paper as Mr. Lewis is not present.
MR. HOGABOOM: The announced
subject of this paper might be construed as indicating that the chromium plating
of die cast products is
fundamentally different
from the chromium plating of other metal products. Let it be understood,
however,
that such is not the case; on the contrary, most of the observations
here
set down apply equally to all products which are plated with chromium
over nickel.
It has been aptly stated that the plating of chromium
over nickel is a certain test of the adhesive quality of the nickel deposit,
from
which it follows
that to produce a successful chromium finish upon a nickel plated
die casting
we
must be assured of a nickel deposit which is free from internal
stresses and sufficiently thick to resist the tendency to peel
under the influence
of the
chromium plating process. To this end several factors should be
under control.
While these may seem obvious, any one of them, if
overlooked, may be the cause of the failure of the finish; first, cleaning.
Since
it is
common
practice to clean zinc base die castings electrolytically by making
the work the cathode
in alkaline cleaning solutions the composition of these cleaners
should be such that there will be no tendency to deposit upon the
work any
zinc, copper,
etc., which is usually present in cleaning solutions which have
been in use on zinc-alloy castings. Metals so deposited in the
electro-cleaning
may cause
peeling of the nickel deposit in the chromium plating operation.
Second:
rinsing. It is well known that cleaning solutions of various compositions vary
in respect to the ease with which they may be
rinsed from the work.
To be assured of complete and thorough rinsing it is usually advisable
to pass
the work through a neutralizing dip to convert any alkali adhering
to the work to salts which may be readily rinsed off. For this
purpose a
dilute
acid may
be used, e. g., a three per cent solution of muriatic acid in water.
Third: nickel plating. In the nickel plating operation, the factors
which influence
the adhesive quality of the deposit, presuming the work to be chemically
clean, are the composition, temperature, and relative acidity of
the solution. The
composition of nickel solutions suitable for zinc die castings
is more or less limited to the citrate type and the high sulphate
type
in either
of
which considerable
latitude as to actual proportions of the constituent salts is allowable.
More important, perhaps, is the matter of impurities. Of these,
iron is usually the most conspicuous and troublesome. Fortunately,
it
may be rather
easily
removed by oxidizing with hydrogen peroxide, or potassium permanganate,
and precipitating with ammonia as basic iron compounds, which may
be removed by
either filtering or decanting and subsequently readjusting the
pH.
It is very desirable to keep the solution as nearly free from
dissolved iron as possible in the interest of a malleable, adhesive deposit;
as to temperature,
it is very desirable to keep this as high as compatible with reasonable
throwing power, as temperatures lower than 70° F. are conducive
to hard, brittle deposits, susceptible to cracking and chipping
when chromium plated. The acidity
most favorable to a nickel deposit suitable for chromium plating
is approximately pH 6.0.
By maintaining careful control of the factors
which have been noted failures in chromium plating on zinc alloy
die castings due to
defective nickel
may be minimized, if not eliminated.
In the chromium plating process
a satisfactory deposit depends almost equally upon the mechanical and chemical
phases of the process.
Chemically,
the
solution should conform quite closely to the formula:
CrO3—32
oz./gal.
Cr3(SO4)3—.4 oz./gal.
On small installations the sulphate content is
found to remain quite constant if the dragout is not excessive, and if evaporation
is replaced
with tap
water, which usually contains some sulphates. Commercial chromic
acid also contains
sufficient sulphate in most cases to maintain the proper ratio
of sulphate to chromic acid. It is necessary, however, to check
the
sulphate content
by analysis at frequent intervals to insure against trouble from
variations in
this constituent. The actual chromic acid content is subject to
rapid decline under operating conditions, due to its reduction
to chromium
dichromate,
and must be frequently replenished. The hydrometer test is of little
value in determining
the chromic acid content in solutions which have been operated
for any-considerable time. When chemical control is not readily
available,
a deficiency of-
chromic acid is usually indicated by the appearance on the work
of spots which receive
no deposit, at points which receive relatively high current density.
In old solutions containing an accumulation of chromium dichromate,
this spotting
will .occur frequently unless the chromic acid and sulphate content
is maintained
at the prescribed concentration.
The mechanical features of chromium
plating involve first of all the control of the temperature of the solution.
While it is possible
to
control the
temperature manually, the advantages of automatic control make
it almost indispensable
to production plating. Under the heads of mechanical factors should
also be mentioned the method of racking the work. The same principles
govern
as in
nickel plating. Small parts may be grouped upon the rack in such
a manner as to shade each other at points where burning might be
expected.
The difficulty of covering the edges of holes may be overcome by
plugging with suitable stoppers. Since this difficulty is apparently
caused
by excessive agitation due to the concentration of currents of
free hydrogen
at these
points,
it seems logical to make .use of this effect by suspending the
part to be plated in such a position that thin edges and other
projections
which
receive
the
greatest relative current density will also be in the line of hydrogen
currents rising from other parts of the work. These currents of
gas, by agitating
the solution at the desired point, serve the purpose of reducing
the tendency to
burning at such points. As an illustration of this, consider the
plating of a part having the shape of a disc with thin edges. If
the piece
is suspended with its flat surface vertical and parallel to the
anodes the
lower edge
will
almost certainly be burned at the voltage necessary to cover the
whole surface, while the deposit at the top edge will be very thin.
If,
however, the piece is suspended with the flat surface horizontal and below
the anodes; a relatively high current may be applied-without
burning
the edges,
since all of the hydrogen liberated on the lower surface of the
disc must rise around the edge and set up agitation at that point
which
will effectively
prevent
burning.
The notoriously poor throwing power of chromic acid solutions
is frequently made even worse by certain conditions in the nickel
coating. This is
particularly true of brass parts which have been barrel nickeled,
and the recessed parts
of tank plated die castings which receive a comparatively thin
deposit of nickel. Whether the difficulty of covering these surfaces
with
chromium is
due to a
film of oxide upon the nickel or to the presence of other metals
in the nickel deposit has not yet been determined. It has been
found, however,
that in
the case of die castings whose very irregular shape made nickel
plating difficult and chromium plating nearly impossible, the difficulty
may
be overcome by
immersing
the nickel plated part in a dilute solution of sulphuric and nitric
acid containing some copper sulphate, and rinsing thoroughly just
before plating
with chromium.
In this way parts having fairly deep recesses may be completely
covered
with chromium at relatively low current densities.
Another factor
which seems to have considerable influence on throwing power is the cleaning
of the work. The usual procedure of simply
wiping the color-buffed
nickeled surface before chromium plating serves very well on simple
shapes but on the more intricate shapes further precautions seem
desirable. The most effective, as well as the most simple, expedient,
is to take
the parts
from
the nickel coloring operation and suspend them at once in the chromium
plating solution, applying just enough current to cause slight
evolution of hydrogen
for a short time, e. g., thirty seconds. This serves to remove
the light
film of grease from the work. The current density may then be increased
as much
as is necessary to completely cover the work. This procedure serves
to increase the apparent throwing power as work treated in this
way may
be plated at
a considerably higher current density without burning than is possible
without the application of the low initial cleaning current
This
covers the subject of Chromium Plating Die Cast Products as far as the limited
observations of the writer permit. While it
is obvious
that
the statements
herein are not supported by scientific explanations, it is hoped
that they will stimulate discussion which will be of value to the
plating
profession.
(Applause.)
PRESIDENT FEELEY: As the author of the paper is not
here (interrupted)
MR. HOGABOOM: I would like to discuss that paper.
MR. HAY: I want to ask Mr.
Hogaboom if it is possible to chromium plate die casting successfully in order
to stand up against atmospheric
corrosion.
MR. HOGABOOM: No, and yes. You can plate die castings
so as to have a complete covering of nickel so that there will be no porosity.
Such die
castings
according to some good authorities have proven to be poor withstanding
actual corrosion.
There seems to be an effect of the metal so that there will be
blistering.
If, however, a light coating of nickel is placed on a die casting
so that there is some porosity, then whatever occurs in the die
casting comes out
in the
porosity and you can wipe it off and the nickel does not peel.
MR.
HAY: I would like to ask you another question, Mr. Hogaboom. Does the temperature
have any effect on the corrosion of die castings?
The
temperature
of conditions
or atmosphere.
MR. HOGABOOM: Yes, just the same as—wasn’t
there an illustration on the board the other night, or a photograph
of Mr. Liscomb’s where temperature
of a nickel plated soft metal was increased. I believe the work
was done in Hanlon’s plant, and you got a sweating out where
there was tin in the die casting through the pores of the metal.
Evidently
that has been done. Now,
about die castings, I believe that a great deal of the trouble,
not all of it, has been due to a point that has not been brought
up, to my knowledge,
at any electro-chemical or electro-plating meeting.
Dr. —,
who is professor of metallurgy at Yale, who is consulting metallurgist
for the New Jersey Zinc Company, and probably one
of the best authorities on
zinc in this country, has found that very slight impurities of
certain materials in die cast metal, poisons the die casting and
that these have a material effect
upon not only the life of the die casting itself but on the finishing
and the subsequent deposit. Such a paper, I believe, was presented
a little over a
year ago at the Institute of Metals. I have promised myself several
times to go down and see Dr. Mathewson (?), with whom I have a
pleasant acquaintance,
and obtain the paper and see if it could not be presented so the
platers could have access to it.
It is well known in the electro-deposition
of zinc and refining that small percentages of impurities, for example one
hundredth
of one
per cent of
cobalt in a solution used for electrolytic recovery of zinc will
prevent deposition
entirely. So there may be impurities, or, he has proven at least
that there are impurities in die castings that will act as the
beginning of the diseases
that will grow during the life of the die casting.
MR. HAY: I want to ask another question. With the proper pH of
sixty with die casting, that is I mean nickel plate before you
chrome plate,
taking
into consideration
you would clean the die casting properly under ordinary conditions,
would you believe you would get any peeling?
MR. HOGABOOM: The pH
may be changed. If the die casting was not clean on account of the material
that has gone in the solution,
I think
the cleaning
is essential.
Dr. Hiram Lukins in a recent paper before the Electro-Chemical
at Bridgeport showed conclusively that poisons not clean did not
permit
the complete
reduction of chromic acid from (?). There was a me-dium point there
in which there
was a creation of chromium trioxide. That built up the chromium
bichromate in the
solution which was very detrimental and in commercial work he has
found that work that has not been cleaned, that solution is in
which work
is put that
have not been cleaned, can be plated, that those solutions build
up very rapidly in chromium bichromate and therefore destroy their
efficiency.
I would like to speak just one moment, I know the time
is short, on Mr. Lewis’ paper.
He states that if he is plating work in a special plating barrel
or work that has deep recesses, and he puts it in chromium solutions
he is apt to get a
peeling in the recess and wonders whether that is due to a film
of oxygen or what it may be due to. I am wondering whether it may
not be due to the porosity
of nickel, the barrel plated work is porous, the work that is plated
light in deep recesses is porous. It is getting electrochemical
action there. As
soon as he puts that in a copper sulphate solution, which he says
he does, he- gets a precipitation of copper. That precipitation
of copper covers the
base metal. As Graham told you, chromium will deposit on copper
surfaces more readily than upon any other surface. It seems to
me the trouble with which
Mr. Lewis is confronted is porosity of deposits.
DR. BLUM: At various
times during the discussion of chromium plating it has been emphasized one
of the greatest values it has had to
electro-platers is to make them improve their nickel plating, and
this is a good
illustration of that and a very good illustration. It shows it
is possible for Mr.
Lewis
and others to regulate conditions in nickel plating to get any
desired results.
Now, it so happens that in nickel plating die castings
in either of the solutions to which he referred, with either high sulphate,
you
have high
polarization,
that is why you put the citrate or sodium sulphate in there, to
retard the tendency of the zinc to deposit nickel by emersion,
but by that
same fact
as Mr. Graham also pointed out, you tend to make harder and brittler
dips which
therefore are more likely to crack.
Therefore, it is a question of compromise. In other words, Mr.
Lewis uses the citrate or the high sulphate and then in order to
get his
deposit a
little softer he runs up the pH a little bit and the temperature
as high as he can
and still get a satisfactory deposit. A very good illustration.
I would add this on to Mr. Van Dereau’s talk, plating engineering,
simply controlling conditions. Don’t say you get this kind
of a deposit, and therefore it is no good. If you get too hard
you can make it soft,
if too soft you can make
it harder, so that is why I believe chromium plating is going to
be one of the finest things for improving nickel plating also.
(Applause.)
SECRETARY GEHLING: There arises a question in that plating
die castings there that will be brought up at most of the branches
during the
coming year probably,
that a whole lot of the men have overlooked. That man Lewis is
running into part of it. The one thing that impresses me is how
he keeps
plating die castings
in barrels if he has a lot of them and isn’t black nickel
plating them.
It is a difficult thing to plate die castings in a
barrel, if they are small or large. You can plate one or two hatches
or ten hatches,
but
keep plating
all the time and you are going to find out you are up against a
tree. The question is being asked in Philadelphia Branch at the
present
moment. I
will read the
question so as to give you an idea of what we are driving at. “How
can excess zinc be removed from a nickel solution?" This excess
zinc is dissolved in the nickel solution while plating die castings
that cannot and do not have
to be plated in deep recesses.
Every one of you fellows have seen
automobile locks and they are all die castings. The manufacturers
of those plugs and locks do
not want
the die
castings plated
inside because that interferes with the tumbler. There would be
no sense in having castings made in dies if they had to match them
and
check them
up. When
you plate 25,000 to 50,000 of those a day in a solution no matter
how small the particle is that will be dissolved, even if you keep
the
pH of your
nickel between five eight and six you are going to get some of
that zinc in the
nickel solution, and after you plate a while you can imagine that
getting from a hard
brittle deposit you would get from adding zinc to a nickel solution.
Some of our members have added that as a brightener almost to the
point of fact
the
amount of zinc they get in there is what you would put in if you
were going to make up a black nickel solution. You may say, stop
off these
parts in
there; the stop off varnishes are as hard to get off as the plating
from the recesses.
They have a predicament there.
Now, it seems funny in the remarks
in the paper about chromium plating on the die castings on the nickel surface
and having a
porosity.
Personally I plate
quite a few thousand a day of those same lock parts after nickel
in chromium and they lay around and slide around and get thrown
around and there
is no
damage done to them. We don’t have much trouble chromium
plating on the nickel plating and it doesn’t spot through
or break through.
One of the convictions I myself have, the same
as the other two members of our branch, is in keeping the zinc
that dissolves off
the die
castings in
the nickel, keeping it out, otherwise we have to make up nickel
solutions and throw
them away after using them a certain length of time. No matter
what you say at the front they think you don’t know how to
-fix your nickel solutions, they can’t see -the part that
is taking place, that doesn’t interest
them. The only thing that interests them is the fact that you are
throwing away a solution. I think that question will become a debatable
matter during
the coming year. I don’t like to go into further detail.
I would like to see Mr. Lewis’ solutions if he plates much
barrel work in a nickel solution, in about-three months’ time
if he has any sort of production, to see how he keeps it down.
Sodium sulphate or
citrate does not keep the zinc
out of the solution.
MR. HAY: I would like to know the suggestion
of Mr. Gehling. When it comes to drawing away a solution contaminated
with zinc I would
like
to suggest
he use it for a brightener in a nickel solution.
SECRETARY GEHLING:
How much do you think I put in ? (Laughter.)
MR. HAY: It may sound comical but
it isn’t. I think everybody knows that
an excess amount of zinc in the solution would cause ? and it-happens
that in this case, speaking of myself, I am not ashamed to say I got by using
500
gallon solution, adding that to a 4,000 gallon solution, wonderful
results contaminated with zinc.
SECRETARY GEHLING: That may be all right, we
will admit that. I explained that to start. People put zinc in as a brightener
but
you also put
in with a larger
quantity you make a black nickel solution. I have just been informed
by one of the members here that through Mr. Lewis we are confused
in the respect
that he did not barrel plate this nickel, that it is done in a
conveyor tank.
That
relieves my mind because I thought I was way off on the barrel
business.
MR. NAGEL: In reference to getting rid-of the excess zinc,
I have used a solution for six or seven years, didn’t throw any
of it away. You run the pH up to seven, caustic soda, precipitate
most of the zinc, adjust your nickel with
salts and adjust the pH and it is just like a new solution.
MR.
HOGABOOM: If Mr. Nagel would use calcium carbonate he wouldn’t
get precipitation in the nickel.